
Data protection
Retired equipment contains media holding personal data, and the organisation remains responsible for it until it is verifiably deleted. EoL360 documents the sanitisation of every drive, linked to the asset it comes from.
What the regulation requires
Three requirements that must be read together:
- Security appropriate to the risk. The organisation, as data controller, must protect personal data against unauthorised access, loss or destruction, applying technical and organisational measures appropriate to the risk.
- The ability to demonstrate it. Applying those measures is not enough: the controller must be able to demonstrate that it applied them. This is the accountability principle.
- Supplier guarantees. Where a third party processes the data on the organisation’s behalf — here, by handling the media during collection — only a processor offering sufficient guarantees may be chosen.
a drive that leaves the organisation without an individualised sanitisation certificate leaves the company unable to demonstrate that it applied a security measure appropriate to the risk.
Why end of life is a critical moment
Formatting a drive or resetting a device does not verifiably delete the data. Until every drive is sanitised with a recognised method and this is put on record, the data continues to exist and liability remains with the organisation. The risk is concentrated in the stretches where the equipment is no longer under its direct control: prior storage, transport and processing by third parties.
- Prior storage
- Transport
- Third-party processing
- Certified sanitisation
Key articles
What EoL360 documents
| Obligation | Document or function |
|---|---|
| Appropriate security and the ability to demonstrate it | Wiping certificates: one individual certificate per drive, linked to the asset and retrievable by device, batch or fiscal year. |
| Control of the risk stretches | Chain of custody: every handover of the equipment, signed and dated, from the site to sanitisation. |
| Processor guarantees | Data-processing agreement: the operation is formalised through the corresponding agreement, with documented instructions and measures. |
Sanction regime
See fines
Breaching the security-of-processing obligations (arts. 25 to 39, including art. 32) can be sanctioned with fines of up to €10,000,000 or, for a company, up to 2% of its total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher (art. 83.4). Where the art. 5 principles are breached, the limit rises to €20,000,000 or 4% (art. 83.5).
Sanitisation, turned into evidence.
We show you how EoL360 would document the sanitisation of every drive in the organisation’s next refresh process.
Talk to an expert